Am Mittwoch 20 Juli 2011, 16:07:07 schrieb Bruno Friedmann:
On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Ismail Doenmez wrote:
On 07/20/2011 12:28 PM, Lisufas Linuxfreunde wrote:
Am Mittwoch 20 Juli 2011, 11:13:45 schrieb Dirk Müller:
Then why are those broken packages published?
To be able to test them ? I have fixed most of the dependency issues, if there is anything else, please let me know.
Hi,
please correct me, but is not: → Unstable → Factory → KR47 the way of testing and releasing?
Somehow confusing when tested in: Unstable → 47 RC-2, is somehow in KR47, and distributed in the Factory is KDE SC 4.6.5 .... excuse me, but who is to look there?
Would not it be better to focus first to the 4.7 RC-2 is stable enough for factory, and eventually come with Finale 4.7.0 in KR47?
Such charges do not proceed straight to participation in tests at!
For now please use KDE:Unstable:SC for 4.7 testing. We'll notify the list when this changes.
Greetings from the Rainy "Daimler-Country"
Rain in summer, meh ;(
But Uwe give on important point, sure it's usefull to have kr47 be mostly ready for end users at release time. But actually having some package build in it, with unpredictable results for end users, will drive to failures. Perharps until real release of 4.7 we should remove the build publish and/or ask admin to remove any pre-published package
The pressure of users wanting 4.7 will increase in a short time frame now :D
So we can tell them KUSC really unstable, but please test Or wait 4.7 entrance in factory, Then use kr47 when ready
no ?
Hi Bruno, You understand, perhaps incorrectly. I know this may differ, and what packages are in repositories from which my system. I am careful what I get for packages in my system and I can help themselves quite well when problems occur with unstable packages tested. Other user not to use because the naïve view that everything described somewhere and make it their system broken. Then the people running through the forums and then complain about what the KDE project is building for manure. We, yes, I purposely say we (as some users here know I'm probably in the German Wiki a little bit active) should perhaps generally better and more accurately communicate what repos are for that user. If users know the exact date of the KR 47 are only and exclusively be used for tests that can "amateur" the "finger away" and do not use this repo KR47. If the warning is still ignored, the kde team is innocent. But well, let's leave the discussion to be here now, because the topic was probably already discussed often enough. Many greetings from the still rainy, "Daimler-Country" ;-) → Uwe, der Linuxsusefan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Die SuS(i)E samt KDE sei mit euch, wo immer ihr auch seid .... ;) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ############## openSUSE Member ##############