Am Freitag, 14. Januar 2011, 11:37:20 schrieb Gabor:
I think from the end-user point of view the current repo naming is a bit confusing. I vote for structure like
openSUSEx.x:KDE:KDEx.x
This violates BuildService structure, openSUSEx.y is the target here, you can't put that in the front. And we are back to KR4x with your suggestion then =) Btw it seems javier decided for a way forward, maybe he can enlighten the list as well *nudge* ;-) Cheers, Karsten
-- Regards gpe
On Thursday 13 Jan 2011 06:29:36 Rajko M. wrote:
On Wednesday, January 12, 2011 08:19:47 pm todd rme wrote:
My concern is if we do a piecemeal approach we will end up with another mess of repositories like we just fixed.
Repo naming: The numbered repo name is in line with upstream and our way referring to particular set of KDE binaries.
Supprot: The most common question when you ask user that has problems is "What KDE version?". For me as casual helper that doesn't pay attention to every rolling repository change, having one repo that has clear reference in the name is very important. It saves me time to check repo status before I continue answering. When help is provided via IRC that makes a difference in end user experience.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-kde+help@opensuse.org