On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 08:39 -0500, Paul Cutler wrote:
Hi,
<snip>
But I can't communicate enough how disappointed I am in the sub-domain that has been chosen: http;//rtfm.opensuse.org - RTFM has such a negative connotation, especially from Linux's early years, that while this may be funny to an old-timer that has been using Linux for more than 10 years, to someone who is new and needs help, this is a bad message to send. Whether they have tried to get help on IRC or a forum and have been told to go "RTFM" we shouldn't encourage that kind of behavior by naming a sub-domain "RTFM".
Allow me: 1. RTFM provides high notoriety! This can be explored. It is the job of Marketing to make sure that the right message is passed to users. So, if no one cares about providing the users the reasons why 'RTFM' was selected, then it might fail, otherwise, it might actually be a success. 2. Many people that I know were actually self-learners through documentation, in a way, they used the 'RTFM' process to learn. How can this be negative? 3. RTFM is a sort of (urban?) 'geeky myth' and has strong roots in the community and even outside. I've never seen no one bashing down the RTFM method, instead I've seen many people preaching about it. So it can't be that negative. 4. The process (of building and servicing documentation) is where we actually should place energy, not the name, though the name does actually fit in the means of the project. 5. Can you provide a study that actually can support the claim that 'RTFM' is actually 'negative' and such case, negative in each way? 6. I find more dangerous to change the name and kill the motivation of the people working for it (which we should support in the first place), than exactly keeping RTFM. Like Bryen said... openSUSE is a caring community and very democratic (unlike other projects), therefore, the best way would be to take this to openFATE. But once more I want to make clear that changing the name might kill motivation for the people who are actually giving their time and commitment to make this happen. I know there are some people with background to support this, for example with 'Motivation Theories' which are a part of Psychology (maybe Jos) and I would like to ear their thoughts about how harmful this kind of changes can be in a community when it comes to motivation. I'm pretty sure that Paul and many other people here on the Desktop area (and those around kernel) have heard the term BFS (BRAINFUCK SCHEDULER), which is pretty much more 'harmful' than 'RTFS', In other words: * RTFM has enough notoriety to boost this project; * RTFM is a geeky myth known by many; * RTFM does fit in the organizational goals of the project; * RTFM is easy enough to provide a hook for the audience; * RTFM will be connoted with what we want people to do it (else we fail as marketing); * RTFM is a contribution, therefore, we should respect the wishes of the people placing the work on it, as we do to any other contributions. I would rather see a reason with substance to support a claim that could kill the project on it's very own birth, than just a claim made out of thin air. nelson
Call it docs.opensuse.org, help.opensuse.org, userhelp.opensuse.org or anything else. There's no reason to continue an old stereotype or use an abbreviation in a sub-domain that contains profanity.
If anyone can pass this on to the community members who set this up or share their contact information I'm more than happy to pass on this feedback.
Thanks.
Paul
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-gnome+help@opensuse.org