On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 14:06 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 11:59 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Thu, 2007-09-27 at 15:35 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote:
What about GNOME:UNSTABLE? If anybody volunteer to start update to 2.21, there is a chance. Otherwise, we can freeze or drop this repository for some time.
I think it makes a lot of sense to use G:U for 2.21/2.23/etc. In the longer term, we should get coordinated with the GNOME Build Brigade (http://live.gnome.org/BuildBrigade) to do compilation tests and binary packages for unstable GNOME releases.
Yes. But is there any 2.21 package already? If not, we should stop/drop G:U to not waste resources having exactly the same in G:S and G:U.
We could revive it whenever we'll start with 2.21.
no, no 2.21 releases yet, so yes, we can wait until there is a release, or just start adding unstable packages from SVN versions, or something like that. But yes, I guess we can drop it until then if it's wasting resources
The draft schedule is at: http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone
So 2.21.1 packages will be available in < 1 month.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear