Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (295 mails)

< Previous Next >
[opensuse-factory] openSUSE reproducible builds status 2020-09
Hi,

last month's status:
https://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2020-08/msg00355.html

Last months' reproducible builds project updates (including my work):
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2020-08/

I uploaded https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/ today
and rbstats are:
total-packages: 13408 (+164)
build-tried: 13401 (+165)
build-failed: 26 (-40)
build-n-a: 137 (+12)
build-succeeded: 13238 (+193)
build-official-failed+na: 214 (-109)
build-compare-failed: 405 (-26)
build-compare-succeeded: 12833 (+219)
verify-failed: 514 (-5)
verified-semi-reproducible: 12479 (+117)
bit-by-bit-identical: 12694 (+206)
not-bit-by-bit-identical: 524 (-34)
not-bit-by-bit-identicalcheck: 544 (-13)

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/graph.png
shows the change over time

https://rb.zq1.de/compare.factory-20201001/unreproduciblerings.txt
lists very unreproducible core packages (bootstrap+DVD)

Of the badly unreproducible packages,
2 were in ring0
46 were in ring1

That makes it 48/3369 => 1.42 %
which is below the overall average of
405/13238 => 3.06 %

524/13238 => 3.96 % of packages are not perfectly reproducible


Newly unreproducible packages:
python-scikit-learn
nondeterminism from parallelism via cython+openmp

other notable:
kopete
still suffers from https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-83186

libpinyin
.bin files generated by cpp - maybe uninitialized memory


Ciao
Bernhard M.

< Previous Next >
This Thread
  • No further messages