On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 01:23:06PM +0200, Michal Suchánek wrote:
So according to this statistic the kernel build takes much longer than kernel compression. What this does not take into account is that much time is spent in some time kind of rpm checkers some of which are run as part of build (ie file deduplication for kernel-source which is required because it has so many duplicate files it would overflow badness limit).
And it does not give statistics for the other parts (ie debuginfo extraction and checkers accounted separately).
Here's all the data for kernel-vanilla and kernel-default: kernel-vanilla: startup: 22 vm: 7 pkginstall: 32 build_start: 6 build_prep: 99 build_build: 5940 build_install: 160 build_dbgextract: 700 build_collectfiles: 869 build_writerpms: 942 build_clean: 7 build_post: 716 rpmlint: 91 buildcmp: 1 finish: 23 kernel-default 12 7 32 5 50 2594 67 281 381 636 2 533 65 1 5 startup: 12 vm: 7 pkginstall: 32 build_start: 5 build_prep: 50 build_build: 2594 build_install: 67 build_dbgextract: 281 build_collectfiles: 381 build_writerpms: 636 build_clean: 2 build_post: 533 rpmlint: 65 buildcmp: 1 finish: 5
All in all I am surprised that kernel-vanilla occupies top places when kernel-default does more work and did not even make it to the top list. I suspect some bias in the data.
Sure, it's just the data from the last successful build. To make it really meaningful it would need to be averaged over a couple of builds. Still, it is useful to find out how percentages, i.e. how does the build time compare to the compression time. Cheers, Michael. -- Michael Schroeder mls@suse.de SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF Jeff Hawn, HRB 16746 AG Nuernberg main(_){while(_=~getchar())putchar(~_-1/(~(_|32)/13*2-11)*13);} -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org