On 13/02/2019 21:48, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Wednesday 2019-02-13 11:48, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
Boot the installation DVD, and ask for the rescue system. What editor do you see there? joe
Why not nano?
Why not pico?
If it comes down to bikeshedding, the discussion will go nowhere.
Well nano is a pretty reasonable suggestion, its still small, has reasonable dependencies, its not hard to use for a command line text editor and one would probably say its more common then joe so if we were making that decision again for the rescue system going for nano instead might make sense. In fact it was such a reasonable request that while writing this email I created submit requests to add nano to the rescue system on tumbleweed and leap 15.1 However, we are not talking about the rescue system here and at the point were installing joe, we are also installing nano and vim and if your really feeling special you can even run vi as provided by busybox-static. Personally i'm still more likely to go with the remove the desktop files then remove joe from the pattern. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B