Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (536 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-factory] Re: Please fix this before the release...
Am 22.05.2018 um 10:05 schrieb Andreas Schwab:
On Mai 18 2018, Jimmy Berry <jberry@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

- Packman

<repository name="openSUSE_Leap_42.3">
<path project="openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Leap:42.3:Update"
repository="standard"/>
<path project="openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Leap:42.3:Update" repository="ports"/

<repository name="openSUSE_Leap_15.0">
<path project="openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update"
repository="standard"/>
<path project="openSUSE.org:openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update" repository="ports"/


Summary, Packman has the same config for 15.0 as 42.3. Leap has a different
ports config for 15.0 and should be changed to match. Presumably others on
OBS
will have a similar problem when building against ports on OBS.

A workaround is to use separate repositories for standard and ports
architectures.

That's not a workaround but actually the expected setup I'd say. Maintenance
for example also does it that way.

I don't understand why OBS does not find the x86_64 binaries needed since a
path element explicitly includes the standard repo. The ports repository
does
not have x86_64 available so how it is seemingly "overriding" is bizarre.

Only the last path element is recursively expanded, and
openSUSE:Leap:15.0:Update/ports has no connection to
openSUSE:Leap:15.0/standard.

Is only looking recursively at the last repo a bug or a feature of
obs?

cu
Ludwig

--
(o_ Ludwig Nussel
//\
V_/_ http://www.suse.com/
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard,
Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups