On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 15:40 +0200, Vojtěch Zeisek wrote:
There are hundreds distributions at https://distrowatch.com/ You listed few. Does it prove anything?
Those are most popular and big Linux distros.
Isn't KDE more configurable, powerful, feature-rich, with more modern architecture, etc.?
Yes, KDE is extremely configurable and feature-rich, but I think this is a bad approach, because KDE is a little confusing, I'm not fan of minimalism, but I think it is better that KDE reduce some less-usable features and focus on stability and productivity.
What does prevent anyone from install and use anything he/she likes?
It is not about personal preference, it is about *technical competence*.
Is not GNOME more secure than KDE even?
Any evidence? No? If not, this is just useless blah blah statement without any value.
I don't know about security of KDE, I asked that question in the hope that someone provide a good technical description. Because GNOME is more used than KDE and is used by big distros, I got the impression that GNOME is more secure than KDE, of course I know that GNOME is not impeccable in this field, for example, WebKitGTK+ has many security vulnerabilities: https://webkitgtk.org/security.html 134 vulnerabilities only in one Security Advisory: https://www.google.com/search?q=WSA-2015-0002 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org