On 03/04/2017 11:27 PM, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
* Stefan Seyfried
[03-03-17 23:29]: On 03.03.2017 11:23, Carlos E. R. wrote:
With a difference. You can do the things emacs does with any other editor plus other tools for those other things it does which I do not know about. Not with systemd, there is no alternative.
Hu? There are many more linux systems running fine without systemd than there are running systemd.
w/o reference, your statement is merely a collection of symbols without any validity, best left unsaid, ie: FUD.
This whole argument is pretty pointless without some firmer description of the types of systems, for example new Samsung TV's / smartwatches for atleast the last year use Tizen which is a linux os that uses systemd, conversely there is a huge number of embedded Linux devices using things like busybox which last time I checked didn't use systemd. The number of devices in both categories likely dwarfs the number of other Linux systems so you can't really say that more or less use systemd because the reality is we don't know although given how long embedded stuff takes to adapt my guess is Stefan is probably right although maybe not for the reasons he thinks. -- Simon Lees (Simotek) http://simotek.net Emergency Update Team keybase.io/simotek SUSE Linux Adelaide Australia, UTC+10:30 GPG Fingerprint: 5B87 DB9D 88DC F606 E489 CEC5 0922 C246 02F0 014B