On 30.11.2016 11:56, Michael Schroeder wrote:
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:21:21AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 30 2016, Michael Schroeder
wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 11:05:21AM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
On Nov 30 2016, Michael Schroeder
wrote: systemd-32bit already contains a packageand(systemd:pam-32bit),
What do you mean with "contains"?
It was supposed to read "Supplements: packageand(systemd:pam-32bit)"
$ rpm -q --supplements systemd-32bit packageand(systemd:pam-32bit)
How is that relevant?
So you think the recommends systemd-32bit in the pattern is correct and all other pam packages that use a supplements are broken?
Can you come down and talk about facts? The recommends for systemd-32bit are in rest_cd_* patterns that no user will have installed and Ludwig explained their purpose in detail on this mailing list this week. And there is a comment before this recommends explaining its need: # sssd-32bit pulls in some pam-32bit, which results in the need to also have # systemd-32bit available (or pam-config -a --systemd will fail later on) Recommends: systemd-32bit Greetings, Stephan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org