On 13 May 2016 at 09:10, Per Jessen
Yup. Try this one -
a) dhcpv6-PD is standard b) wicked does not support dhcpv6-PD c) .....
Lets start by stating the obvious wicked has an active upstream (last commit 2 days ago) https://github.com/openSUSE/wicked wicked is actively maintained (last updated in Factory 5 days ago) https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/wicked/wicked.... Therefore, any issue is potentially resolvable, compared to lilo where upstream is dead and no maintainer has touched the package in Factory for well over a year. But lets dig a little deeper with your specific claim that "> dhcpv6-PD is standard" a standard which no other Linux network manager supports it seems Network Manager: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593815 networkd: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/1080 We have rudimentary support in dhcpcd, which is included in Tumbleweed. https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/IPv6#With_dhcpcd How about we have this discussion about lilo based on simple facts rather than making problems up to throw around as a distraction? lilo is currently not building correctly lilo is unmaintained upstream lilo is effectively unmaintained in openSUSE ---- at this point, in my opinion we have sufficient grounds for dropping lilo. These would need to be fixed in order to keep lilo in the distribution. But given these points were made right out of the gate in the thread and people were still advocating we keep lilo below are a few extra points worth considering to add to the case to remove it, or to challenge whoever wants to step up to take this orphaned pile of dead code. lilo is broken, the updatelilo scripts cannot find any kernel 3.x or 4.x version. lilo cannot support our default filesystem, btrfs lilo cannot fully support increasingly common GPT partition tables lilo cannot fully support more complex RAID setups -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org