Op woensdag 30 maart 2016 17:39:49 CEST schreef Basil Chupin:
On 29/03/16 20:44, Knurpht - Gertjan Lettink wrote:
Op dinsdag 29 maart 2016 20:11:17 CEST schreef Basil Chupin:
On 29/03/16 11:32, Felix Miata wrote:
Simon Lees composed on 2016-03-29 08:48 (UTC-1030):
On a clean install I did last week I discovered enlightenment had no sound, this was due to the missing pulseaudio-module-x11. Currently the Gnome, Mate and KDE patterns all recommend pulseaudio-module-x11 (along with several other modules) which leads me to the question is it possible to have working audio on a desktop out of the box without the pulseaudio-module-x11 package on any desktop, if not I am proposing that we move the recommends on PulseAudio into the x11 or x11_opt package (I'm open to either) if some other desktops don't require this package for audio i'm happy to add the recommends to the enlightenment pattern.
This issue is currently being tracked in boo#972912
https://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=972912
Over the past 5 months or so, I've recorded installed sound-related packages[1] on 58 13.1, 13.2, 42.1 and TW installations here. 58 have KDE3, TDE, KDE4 and/or K5 as DE. One additionally has Enlightenment, but since its menu was completely illegible, I didn't try to use it except to exit the session, so didn't test its sound or record its sound packages. On only a single one of the 58 is pulseaudio-module-x11 installed. It was not required to make system sounds, yast2 test sound, aplay test sound or Youtube sounds in Firefox on any of those that have working sound (most do). Most on which I never got sound to work were either 13.2, or TDE on 42.1[2]. Whether it is actually required to make sounds on the exception, TDE on 13.1, I have no idea.
Look, there is a person who is being paid by MicroFocus to be doing the job of being the person for QA for openSUSE.
Questions like the one you pose above should be directed at that QA person because they don't appear to be simple questions about sudden "bugs".
Come to think of it, why paying someone for being a "QA" person and also have a "bugzilla" where other non-paying people are solving problems which -- the way I see it -- should be foreseen and prevented by a QA person?
But then, what do I know?
[pruned]
Ciao,
BC
https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Mailing_list_netiquette#Don.27t_be_aggres sive
To elaborate: the last line of the chapter.
Then the above is totally aimless, and your private mail is also totally
The private mail you're referring to was not my private mail, as the first line clearly indicates: "On behalf of the openSUSE Board: We .....". The message was sent as a private email, not as a public list message, but if you want to discuss it here, it might, for completeness sake, be better to share the entire content instead of just referring to it.
pointless, because as Richard states in the following response:
"There is no employee of SUSE being paid for being the job for QA for openSUSE."
How, then, can anyone carry out a "personal attack" against someone who doesn't exist?
Again, this is a reference to the private mail.
Ciao,
BC
-- Gertjan Lettink, a.k.a. Knurpht openSUSE Board Member openSUSE Forums Team -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@opensuse.org