Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-factory (776 mails)

[Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I might have to run a newer benchmark though. This[1] one's newer, and
> looks a lot better for ext4.
>
> In general, database workloads are special, and the dumber the FS the better.

...

> Good thing you prompted me for data.
>
>
> [0] 
> http://serenadetoacuckooo.blogspot.com.ar/2011/04/ext4-performance-and-barrier-option.html
> [1] 
> http://www.ilsistemista.net/index.php/linux-a-unix/21-ext3-ext4-xfs-and-btrfs-filesystems-comparison-on-linux-kernel-300.html?start=6
> [2] 
> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/ext4-finally-doing-the-right-thing-td2076089.html


Do check out the previous page with MySQL benchmarks, showing the opposite.

It's not quite so clear-cut anymore (it used to be ext3 winning all
the time, but now it's not that ext4 wins all the time either).

Curious thing there is btrfs.
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-factory+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx