Le mercredi 28 mars 2012 à 16:47 +0200, Jos Poortvliet a écrit :
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 20:17:59 Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 27/03/12 19:16, Joerg Mayer escribió:
What I don't understand is, why is os following so early/at all? Is the os project more or less blindly following fedora design decisions now?
sharing policies and implementation details with other mayor distributions will actually save us from a lot of work and reinvention.
Yup. Plus that systemd is simply an upstream project, like it or not. I do support that we try to follow them, but not too fast (let Fedora test it for us please, that's what they do after all - test new stuff) and surely not like headless chickens. This move seems wrong to me... Esp for low-memory systems.
I forgot to mention in my initial mail we should probably restrict the
maximum size of tmpfs /tmp (so it doesn't hit swap). Debian is doing
this already, so it might be worth looking at their work
( http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2012/03/msg01713.html ).
They also had/have their set of flames and bug reports. I'll try to put
everything on our wiki, for easier reference.
--
Frederic Crozat