On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:35:55AM +0200, Guido Berhoerster wrote:
In general, I like this approach (working on *:Update), and it is a little bit unfair to pretend that there is no action ;) Many developers still do not know that fixing "minor" bugs for a released openSUSE product is appreciated by me and you. They often think working those bugs is not allowed. Point them http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Maintenance - the team waits to be asked. The criteria listed on http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Maintenance_policy are quite restrictive (data loss/corruption with common configurations, regressions to previous releases or due to
* Stephan Kulow
[2011-07-12 09:08]: previous updates), if actual practice has diverged from that an update to the policy might encourage more maintenance work on released versions. We approve fixes for nearly every bug that is queried from us. I will check the page.
Ciao, Marcus (openSUSE Maintenance) All in all imho name the last milestone anything from alpha to omega and
On 07/12/2011 05:43 AM, Marcus Meissner wrote: people won't test until they see a RC in the release name and complain that it isn't of rc quality. Back in openSUSE 11.3 when we were using alpha and beta releases people would wait until rc to test . Maybe rename milestone 6 to RC-0.5 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org