On Apr 11, 11 19:44:30 +0200, Per Jessen wrote:
jdd wrote:
Le 11/04/2011 19:20, Per Jessen a écrit :
Yet again, I fail to see any proposal, or fact to make the supposed problem any better.
Maybe jdd meant to say solicit or invite proposals ?
I at least asked to have a web site/page with the bstatus of an application: tested, when, by howmany people
this at least would allow to know if anybody use it :-)
it seems to me obvious than an app that simply don't load was not tested at all
I agree - amazingly it can't have been tested much by whoever is maintaining it. Maybe we need a sign-off-like procedure from maintainers before something goes into the release-cycle?
Add a trivial test suite, like launching an app with --version option, or whatever is available. Then you know that it at least starts. cheers, JW- -- o \ Juergen Weigert paint it green! __/ _=======.=======_ <V> | jw@suse.de back to ascii! __/ _---|____________\/ \ | 0911 74053-508 __/ (____/ /\ (/) | _____________________________/ _/ \_ vim:set sw=2 wm=8 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) SuSE. Supporting Linux since 1992. -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org