-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/06/2010 12:11 PM, Dominique Leuenberger wrote:
On 08/06/2010 at 3:55 PM, "Carlos E. R."
wrote: That would be the appropriate move, of course. If a separate /usr partition is no longer supported, its better if /usr is removed completely, in order to avoid confusions. And of course, the documentation has to be changed. For example, chapter IV.20,
The Directory Structure
/usr
/usr has nothing to do with users, but is the acronym for UNIX system resources. The data in /usr is static, read-only data that can be shared among various hosts compliant with the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard (FHS). This directory contains all application programs and establishes a secondary hierarchy in the file system. KDE4 and GNOME are also located here. /usr holds a number of subdirectories, such as /usr/bin, /usr/sbin, /usr/local, and /usr/share/doc.
It could only be propely shared between computers of the same arch anyhow... On my system most binaries in there are elf64, which would certainly not run on other computers here... so sharing using NFS would be impossible anyway (this is ok for /usr/lib, as there we split /usr/lib64 again).
I don't really get this argument. Why wouldn't you have 32- and 64-bit /usr's that get exported to the different arches? - -Jeff - -- Jeff Mahoney SUSE Labs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxcW+EACgkQLPWxlyuTD7KhMACeLlna6gVqnm7WHjxcEIfXa8Hx KU4An2crOUuWFfo84+lIgEMQBgllWRKO =VVZ6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org