12 Aug
2009
12 Aug
'09
10:55
Am Wednesday 12 August 2009 12:46:29 schrieb Andrea Florio:
Michal Seben ha scritto:
from my point : + user gets updates automatically - we want limit non-free software to minimum
Question is how strict are rules for non-free packages ?
The question is: WHY we want limit non-free software to minimum ?
since we removed NON-OSS stuffs from DVD i see no reson to keep that to minimum. lots of distros (mandriva, ubuntu, ecc) provides a non-free repo (not enabled by default) that provides everything is useful to end-user like codec, skype, drivers (broadcom, madwifi, ecc) and so on.
if we can made end-user's life easier, why shouldn't do it?
+1 Daniel