Michal Seben ha scritto:
from my point : + user gets updates automatically - we want limit non-free software to minimum
Question is how strict are rules for non-free packages ?
The question is: WHY we want limit non-free software to minimum ? since we removed NON-OSS stuffs from DVD i see no reson to keep that to minimum. lots of distros (mandriva, ubuntu, ecc) provides a non-free repo (not enabled by default) that provides everything is useful to end-user like codec, skype, drivers (broadcom, madwifi, ecc) and so on. if we can made end-user's life easier, why shouldn't do it? Andrea -- ------------------------------------------ Andrea Florio QSI International School of Brindisi Sys Admin openSUSE-Education Administrator openSUSE Official Member (anubisg1) Email: andrea@opensuse.org Packman Packaging Team Email: andrea@links2linux.de Web: http://packman.links2linux.org/ Cell: +39-328-7365667 ------------------------------------------