On Thursday 06 August 2009, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The reason why he could be successful is that the Linux distributors that followed his lies did never ask a lawyer. If they did, they did of course know that there was nothing but lies...
2. You, as the author, are the only one who could dual license it to stop such discussions once and for all.
I already asked you to stop your claims!
What you are doing is called slander.
Wrong.. The definition of slander..A type of defamation. Slander is an untruthful oral (spoken) statement about a person that harms the person's reputation or standing in the community. Because slander is a tort (a civil wrong), the injured person can bring a lawsuit against the person who made the false statement. If the statement is made via broadcast media -- for example, over the radio or on TV -- it is considered libel, rather than slander, because the statement has the potential to reach a very wide audience. Nothing he said is slanderous. EOD. You are so full of legal phrases that one wonders how you get anything done on your program.
You ignore the reality, so please go away if you are unable to have a fact based discussion.
No, you should go away until you can have a rational discussion. Don't bother with a reply. AFAIC you just made the bit bucket. Mike -- Powered by SuSE 11.0 Kernel 2.6.25 KDE 3.5 Kmail 1.9 10:07pm up 2 days 3:56, 2 users, load average: 0.23, 0.14, 0.05 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org