Stephan Kleine
Could you please stop this?
You are trying to claim that there is a license problem in the original software although it has been verified that there is no such problem.
I'm not trying to claim anything here but saying that:
1. The whole mess is about the license.
This is definitely wrong! A OSS hostile downstream package maintainer started a _private_ deffamation campaign in May 2004 and has unfortunately been successful with turning his private campain into a global deffamation campain. The reason why he could be successful is that the Linux distributors that followed his lies did never ask a lawyer. If they did, they did of course know that there was nothing but lies...
2. You, as the author, are the only one who could dual license it to stop such discussions once and for all.
I already asked you to stop your claims! What you are doing is called slander. There is no need to dual license the code as there is no license problem.
4. You ignored the main content of the mail and concentrated again on that legal "is it true or not" discussion instead of simply answering if dual licensing would be an option for you.
So, once again: Would dual licensing it under CDDL & GPL be an option for you? If not, why?
You ignore the reality, so please go away if you are unable to have a fact based discussion. Jörg -- EMail:joerg@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin js@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni) joerg.schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/ URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org