Carlos E. R. wrote:
The Saturday 2008-07-05 at 17:25 -0400, Fred A. Miller wrote:
Now, is all this correct or not?! IF not, then why did openSUSE 11.0 ship with a defective dazuko?! Antivir may not be critical for me, but it sure is for businesses of mixed environment. Someone had to know that this was defective before release.
Instead of grumbling, you and/or the prospective users could have tested 11.0 while it was beta and reported the problem in time. Or, being business, they could use the business version, ie, sles.
Carlos, don't even go there. I had no reason to even mess with Antivir till recently....AFTER 11.0 released. Now, there are sys. admins. who are testing 11.0 to replace either MickySoft and/or a diff. distro. like RH. Well, it's NOT going to happen simply because someone dropped the ball and released a compiled dazuko that won't run. Does this affect me? No....not that much, because if I need a version that does run out-of-the-box for a business, I'll simply use another disto. that does...no problem. So, this hurts Novell and openSUSE a whole lot more than it does me.
On the other hand the problem is being actively investigated and a solution is near, as you can easily investigate and find out.
I didn't read anything like that.....but thanks for the info. It's too late for one site, I think. Fred -- This message originated from a Linux computer using Open Source software: openSuSE Linux 11.0 No Gates, no Windows....just Linux - STABLE & SECURE! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-factory+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-factory+help@opensuse.org