On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
How does this look? Are we fine to go for 10.2 and 10.3 with these? Goals ===== * Clear naming * Smaller repositories for faster metadata download * Use structure for 10.3 again Separate trees ============== * OSS (factory) * NON-OSS (factory-extra) * Debug (factory-debug) * Sources for OSS * Sources for NON-OSS
Naming ====== * let's use "repository" instead of catalog, inst-source etc.
FTP Structure ============= Below .../opensuse/distribution/ we will have a "10.2" with the following subdirectories: * iso * repo
The "iso" subdirectory has the following subdirectories: * delta - delta ISO images * dvd - DVD5 iso images * cd - CD iso images, contains Base CDs and Add-ons (including Non-OSS Addon) * torrent (all torrent files)
The "repo" subdirectory has the following subdirectories: * debug - repository with just debuginfo packages * non-oss - repository with only Non-OSS packages * oss - repository with only OSS packages * src-non-oss - source RPMs for the non-oss tree * src-oss - source RPMs for the oss tree
Factory Distribution ==================== The factory tree should be separated in a similar way:
Below .../opensuse/distribution/ we will have a "factory-repo" with the following subdirectories:
* debug - repository with just debuginfo packages * non-oss - repository with only Non-OSS packages * oss - repository with only OSS packages * src-non-oss - source RPMs for the non-oss tree * src-oss - source RPMs for the oss tree
I really like it. I only wish we could shorten distribution to dist.
Thanks,
--
Boyd Gerber