On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:45:36PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
Robert Schiele
writes: If you could do this at the right time as hardlinks to the factory tree that would be really smart. In that case all mirror servers that have the factory
Factory and our 10.1 tree are not hardlinked, they are internally different. So, it's not possible to do this. I tried to persuade our build guys to sync factory and 10.1 so that it would be hardlinks - but then we would need to sync after the release of 10.1 factory completely :-(
tree could sync without any extra file to transfer saving about 30GB net transfer per mirror server.
Suppose Eberhard would agree with me here.
Everybody would - but it does not fit into the way we work, where we have separate 10.1 and "FACTORY" trees - even if those have the same sources, just are build separately,
You may want to explain what exactly is the reason that you build everything twice from the same sources at all. Robert -- Robert Schiele Tel.: +49-621-181-2214 Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@uni-mannheim.de "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."