Re: smart will nicht so richtig - Probleme mit keys?

Kyek, Andreas, VF-DE schrieb:

Moin,

hier die Ausgabe on smart heute morgen:

--- cut here --- linux:/usr/src # smart upgrade

[...]

Upgrading packages (9): cifs-mount-3.0.23b-0.1.35@i586 kdebase3-SuSE-10.0-21.7@i586 libsmbclient-3.0.23b-0.1.35@i586 samba-3.0.23b-0.1.35@i586 samba-vscan-0.3.6b-4.6.35@i586 digikam-0.8.2-0.pm.1@i586 lftp-3.5.3-3.guru.suse100@i686 openssl-0.9.7g-2.5@i586 samba-client-3.0.23b-0.1.35@i586

25.2MB of package files are needed. 418.7kB will be used.

Confirm changes? (Y/n): y

[...]

Committing transaction... warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 414a57c3 error: To enable the keyserver run: "smart config --set keyserver=pgp.mit.edu" error: samba-client-3.0.23b-0.1.35.i586.rpm: public key not available --- cut here ---

Also wie vorgeschlagen den keyserver gesetzt:

--- cut here --- linux:/usr/src # smart config --set keyserver=pgp.mit.edu --- cut here ---

und wieder upgrade:

--- cut here --- linux:/usr/src # smart upgrade

[...]

Confirm changes? (Y/n): y

Committing transaction... warning: rpmts_HdrFromFdno: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID 414a57c3 Trying to import the key e0d0622b414a57c3 from pgp.mit.edu... gpg: requesting key 414A57C3 from hkp server pgp.mit.edu gpg: key 414A57C3: "Lars Mueller " not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1

The above GPG key has been imported successfully. It is required to install this package:

cifs-mount-3.0.23b-0.1.35.i586.rpm

Do you want to trust this key forever?

You must verify the below fingerprint before answering. pub 1024D/414A57C3 2001-07-16 Key fingerprint = FEEE 231E 36E5 AD5F 1F80 BF7E E0D0 622B 414A 57C3 uid Lars Mueller uid Lars Mueller sub 2048g/BF4BA932 2001-07-16

If you answer "Yes" all other packages signed with this key will be installed automatically. (y/N): Yes

error: cifs-mount-3.0.23b-0.1.35.i586.rpm: public key not available Saving cache... --- cut here ---

und das passiert nun jedesmal (so oft ich das auch aufrufe)

Jemand 'ne Idee, was hier schief läuft? (via rpm -Fvh lassen sich die Pakete alle einspielen; das geht.)

Eventuell ist der gefundenen Key doch nicht der richtige. Keine Ahnung, ob es hilft. In dem unten angegebenen Repo liegen rpmkeys einiger Paketbauer, vielleicht funktioniert es damit, und er findet ein passendes Keyfile. [rpmkeys-100-apt] type = apt-rpm name = SUSE Linux 10.1 APT RPMKeys Repository baseurl = http://ftp.gwdg.de/pub/linux/suse/apt/SuSE/10.0-i386 components = rpmkeys Grüße René