2013/3/18 Christian Berendt
Why we changed from the master tarballs to the milestone tarballs in C:O:M? I thought C:O:M is always the master tarball?
Hi, That's why we started the "should we branch into Grizzly:Staging" discussion last friday. It seems we actually need to branch into Grizzly:Staging to have the latest and greatest in Master all time.
We should use the milestone tarballs in C:O:G, but not in C:O:M!
Possible. or also use the master tarballs there as well as long as upstream hasn't branched for grizzly yet. It seems that is a good compromise for now. so I'll change it accordingly.
And looks like we now use the milestone tarball in openstack-quantum, but in the component packages the master tarballs?
Yes, we should use master all time. Greetings, Dirk -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-cloud+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-cloud+owner@opensuse.org