Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (142 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-buildservice]
Just for clarification: As far as I can see the recent requests to
remove a repo where for 11.2, 11.3 and 12.1. That is why I concluded
that removing the 11.4 repo was a mistake.

Moving on, I would like to have a repo for openSUSE:Evergreen:11.4, at
least for another couple of months (until qgis 2.0, grass 7.0 and
openSUSE 13.1 are stable).

2013/8/21 Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>:
Am Donnerstag, 22. August 2013, 00:21:37 schrieb Marguerite Su:
On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Stephan van den Akker

<stephanv778@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yesterday I noticed that the removal of the repository


OpenSuSE 11.4 is presently on Evergreen LTS, and we use the software
in this repo at the office on our GIS workstation.

Hi, Stephan,

Those SRs are both correct.

openSUSE_11.4 and openSUSE_12.1 are EOL.

The correct repository name for 11.4 LTS is openSUSE:Evergreen:11.4

Although they're actually of the same content, I think making a
proposal to add a LTS repo is easier to get accepted than not to
remove an EOL one.

Because for a large project like openSUSE, to ensure procedures and
process are implemented correctly is the key factor to success/easy
maintenance, XD.

PS: This set of SRs are created by a server script based on the repo
name, so if you pick a wrong name, even if you can survive this
cleanup, you will still have trouble next time.

erm, no, the repo name does not matter. All repos building against the EOL
repos are requested to be removed. But the request can be declined though.


Adrian Schroeter
email: adrian@xxxxxxx

SUSE LINUX GmbH, GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer, HRB 21284
(AG Nürnberg)
Maxfeldstraße 5
90409 Nürnberg

To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >