Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (269 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] Why not just use SVN?
  • From: Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 23:05:11 +0200
  • Message-id: <200809252305.11771.adrian@xxxxxxx>
On Thursday 25 September 2008 22:46:45 wrote Archie Cobbs:
On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thursday 25 September 2008 21:58:22 wrote Archie Cobbs:
The "how to verify and fix broken links?" thread brought up a question
I've always wondered about....

Why does osc not-exactly-duplicate the functionality of svn, instead
of just letting the user use svn directly?

In other words:

- Use svn for all checkout, diff, commit, merge, etc. operations

svn has no functionlity for source links for example. So all the derived
versions would not be possible and manual work would be always needed,
not only when conflicting changes exist.

What do you mean by source links functionality? Clearly svn can't do
"osc up -e"... so that particular functionality would have to remain
part of osc.. But wouldn't it still be possible to use svn for the
stuff svn can do?

Apologies if I'm missing something...

It would make sense to use svn to handle the conflicts, if this modular enough
in svn. But it does not make sense to introduce a protocoll wrapper or
something alike.

bye
adrian

--

Adrian Schroeter
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
email: adrian@xxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >