Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (261 mails)

< Previous Next >
Re: [opensuse-buildservice] project dependencies
  • From: Martin Mohring <martin.mohring@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2008 13:16:04 +0200
  • Message-id: <48564B74.90800@xxxxxxxxx>
Susanne Oberhauser wrote:
Adrian Schröter <adrian@xxxxxxx> writes:

Yes. This is not a big problem (except for storage), but the
question is we want to force the user manually to switch repos on

I think in most cases a :Stable and a :Unstable makes more sense.

Let me try to understand what that means.

So I release some software, Bar-o-meter, 1.0.

I've released and tested Bar-o-meter with some other project Foo-foo,
Version 1.7, which is what's currently in Foo-foo:Stable.

Now Foo-foo:Stable is updated to 2.0, which breaks APIs. Now I have
two bad choices:

* fix my package *right now* and hope nobody has used the broken
repos in-between, no matter what I've originally planned doing

* copy the base packages in a version that works into my project to
be safe from such intrusive changes.

If, however, the release is tagged with some api version, then I've
pointed to Foo-foo:Release-1.7 or Foo-foo:Stable-1.7 and I'm safe.

Or maybe Foo-foo:API-1.7?

I'm bringing this up because we've had exactly this problem when rails
was updated to 2.0 and that broke packages like our obs packages.

If I remember correctly it was vice versa: from some point in time ruby
2.0 was needed, because ruby rails 2.0 features were use in OBS.
Still, there were rails 1.x and rails 2.x pkgs present. But: there is
some unhappyness with lots if copied/linked instead of "included" packs
like python, ruby, etc.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: opensuse-buildservice+help@xxxxxxxxxxxx

< Previous Next >
Follow Ups