Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-buildservice (354 mails)

["Claes Bäckström" <claes.backstrom@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 2/1/07, Michael Schroeder <mls@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:46:47PM +0100, Marcus Hüwe wrote:
> > On 2007-02-01 18:15:19 +0100, andreas.hanke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > >
> > > > python-<originalpackagename>
> > > >
> > > > python-pychm in your case
> > >
> > > Really? I thought the convention was
> > >
> > > python-<importablepackagename>
> > >
> > No. According to the suse package conventions it is:
> > python-XXX (XXX means original module name).
> >
> > See http://forge.novell.com/modules/xfcontent/private.php/library/SUSE%20Package%20Conventions/spc.pdf
> > for more information.
>
> Sounds to me like the package conventions are wrong. Just have a look
> at our python packages...

To be honest I didn't get any wiser.
Both ways sounds sane. But my main problem is still there. Which
should I choose?

python-pychm or python-chm

Warm Regards,
Claes Backstrom