http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1061195
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1061195#c9
--- Comment #9 from Christian Boltz
I found this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/10/3/2 , which pointed me here. The thread debates if this is a kernel regression or not. In my opinion it is a kernel regression. I have passed my information along to the author of the commit.
I somewhat understand why you (as a user) call this a regression ;-) - but I'd call adding support for new rule types (which weren't mediated before and therefore always allowed) a feature, and it was expected that we'll need to add some rules to the abstractions to avoid user-visible breakage. That's why I'm currently using a 4.14 rc kernel - basically I'm eating my own dogfood to avoid trouble for everybody else ;-) The first SR is already on its way to Tumbleweed, weeks before kernel 4.14 is expected there. And I'm also in contact with the libvirt maintainer to make sure the libvirtd profile gets updated (bug 1060860). I've seen in the lkml discussion that you are using the latest kernel (I'd guess from Kernel:HEAD) on Leap. While this isn't officially supported, I'll see if I can include the updated abstractions with the next maintenance update. Until then, feel free to apply the patch from SR 531184 manually. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.