Mailinglist Archive: opensuse-bugs (3354 mails)

< Previous Next >
[Bug 981663] patterns-openSUSE-x11 recommends xorg-x11-Xvnc
  • From: bugzilla_noreply@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 15:40:27 +0000
  • Message-id: <bug-981663-21960-fdkBb2Z19F@http.bugzilla.opensuse.org/>
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=981663
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=981663#c5

Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |IN_PROGRESS
Assignee|xorg-maintainer-bugs@forge. |dimstar@xxxxxxxxxxxx
|provo.novell.com |

--- Comment #5 from Dominique Leuenberger <dimstar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Michal Srb from comment #4)
I see. The dependency on icewm was added as solution for bnc#956537. Ideally
xorg-x11-Xvnc would depend on something like "any desktop environment or
icewm as fallback". No idea if this can be done with RPM.

In theory, yes - all 'WMs' / 'DEs' could provide one 'generic symbol' (e.g
Provides: any-window-manager) and xorg-x11-Xvnc could then Requires:
any-window-manager.

For as long as the user installs a graphical system, this would be satisfied -
otherwise if xorg-x11-Xvnc is benig installed on a system without any DE yet,
zypper will 'pick one' (where it tries to minimize the number of packages
needed).

so, in fact you can't really say : if none is there, pick icewm' - chances are
though that zypp will go this route as it is likely the smallest stack to
chose.

So I don't object removing xorg-x11-Xvnc from the pattern.

Thanks - I'll submit this in the coming days.

--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
< Previous Next >
References