http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=937486
http://bugzilla.opensuse.org/show_bug.cgi?id=937486#c1
Bernhard Wiedemann changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |bwiedemann@suse.com,
| |lnussel@suse.com,
| |ma@suse.com
--- Comment #1 from Bernhard Wiedemann ---
note: drpm files are used to deliver deltas of rpm files
maybe we could patch /etc/mime.types to have
application/x-rpm rpm drpm
IMHO, apart from this, the bug is wrong on many levels.
a) drpm files are probably rpm files - and should be treated by the filter as
such - similar to .htm / .html and .jpg / .jpeg files which do not need
different content either.
b) you can install maintenance updates without .drpm files. I know this,
because I use a repo mirror without .drpm (and duplicate rpm) files, which
works with zypper -n up (but in interactive mode needs an explicit "ignore" per
missing drpm)
c) this filtering is not doing much to increase security while still creating
such headaches for such legitimate uses.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.