https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811830
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811830#c8
--- Comment #8 from Marco M.
The answer to problem 2 is definitely that 'chunk size' isn't meaningful for RAID1, so it is ignored. The chunk size you see listed as 64M is the "bitmap chunk size", which is how much of the array corresponds to each bit in the write-intent bitmap. It is unfortunate that we used the name "chunk size" for both :-(
You mean problem 3 I suppose :-) OK so i can safely ignore chunk size for raid 1 volumes
Problem 1 is strange. I can't see a good reason why one array would come through degraded while the others survived. Have you tried multiple times or did this only happen once? I'll see if I can reproduce it. If I can it shouldn't be hard to isolate the problem.
I reproduced the problem at least 10 times. I've done my tests using vmware. Nothing let me think the problem is hardware related so i think vmware for testing should be ok, but i'm eventually available to try an installation on a real hardware if you think it is necessary. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.