https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429345
User jpr@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=429345#c25
--- Comment #25 from JP Rosevear
Does this mean that my current workaround in ghostscripts spec file is useless? I've done this change on Thu Jan 8 16:13:06 CET 2009 and suspected that this will work due the initial report. OK it requires the include line within /etc/ld.so.conf but AFAIK there is no difference between adding a line to /etc/ld.so.conf or an include file.
No, I was looking at the wrong source/spec combo, so new versions should work. However, I also looked at 10.3 to see what might have changed. There was no libHP_LaserJet_8000.so shlib in the 10.3 ghostscript-omni package. In fact on 10.3 the ghostscript-omni package contained no .so shlibs. Given that, I'm not sure claiming that g_module_* changed is right since on 10.3 no omni libs from the omni package were actually being loaded. FWIW I could find no substantive non-windows changes in that area of glib for at least the past 2 years. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.