https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337059
User sbrabec@novell.com added comment
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=337059#c1
Stanislav Brabec changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
Info Provider| |suse+build@de-korte.org
--- Comment #1 from Stanislav Brabec 2008-05-05 06:19:03 MST ---
Could you counfirm, that I understand correctly the purpose?
1) None of them should be preferred:
nut-hal will be used for local USB UPSes.
In all other cases nut-classic will be needed: Serial UPSes, SNMP remote UPSes,
combination of UPSes.
The disadvantage of nut-classic is impossibility of reuse of HAL power
management frontends.
2) It seems to be a temporary solution. We can get rid hal-classic, if:
- All drivers will be moved to HAL. For undetectable hardware it will require
config based static HAL provider, which does not exist yet (It was rejected in
past by some developers as "against the spirit of hal". Now they have more
positive opinion about it, but somebody must write it.)
- The network UPS logic will be integrated with HAL. It may need a consesus
with an extension of hal power management.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.