https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270555 lrupp@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | ------- Comment #2 from lrupp@novell.com 2007-05-03 07:59 MST ------- (In reply to comment #1)
ladspa-devel.rpm contains only one header file (and docs), which defines API. This header file is required to build all LADSPA plugins. OTOH, ladspa.rpm contains the plugin binaries, and they do require the public header file. Having a public /usr/include/ladspa.h from ladspa-devel reduces this maintenance work (otherwise we have to patch codes).
Sorry for being a bit stupid at the moment: if the plugin binaries require the header file, why do we have an extra *-devel package at all? Why don't you just have a "Provides: ladspa-devel"? The reason behind my question: we want a media containing no *-devel package. The current solution for ladspa is working against this requirement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.