https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270555 tiwai@novell.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX ------- Comment #1 from tiwai@novell.com 2007-05-03 05:21 MST ------- I know it's a bit uncommon style, but I'd resolve this as WONTFIX. ladspa-devel.rpm contains only one header file (and docs), which defines API. This header file is required to build all LADSPA plugins. OTOH, ladspa.rpm contains the plugin binaries, and they do require the public header file. Having a public /usr/include/ladspa.h from ladspa-devel reduces this maintenance work (otherwise we have to patch codes). The reason that we have two spec files is to avoid unnecessary build-trigger. When we use a single spec file, ladspa-devel would be rebuilt often when the dependent packages are updated (e.g. fftw), and this triggers the rebuild of many package depending on ladpsa-devel (again, only for a single header file!). The documents contained in both packages are totally different things. The doucments in ladspa-devel are from ladspa_sdk while documents in ladspa.rpm are from other various tarballs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.