https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207686 dcb314@hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Info Provider|dcb314@hotmail.com | ------- Comment #5 from dcb314@hotmail.com 2006-10-10 11:56 MST ------- (In reply to comment #4)
Right, most of them are the calls not the definition itself. I apologize.
Apology accepted.
What about the definition of SETPOINT2. It's the same issue, isn't it?
True, but that isn't what I reported. If you just want to fix what I reported, then that's fine. Time is short. If you want to fix every undefined code message in the package, then that would be even better, but not required.
What about attaching a patch to make things even easier for us? Just an idea.
Good idea, but the more time I spend attaching patches is less time actually finding the problems. Since I appear to be the only one finding these problems and there appear to be dozens of Novell support staff willing to answer my bug reports, the tradeoff is easy. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.novell.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.