On 19.11.14 17:46, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 19.11.14 17:42, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 17:36, Guillaume Gardet a écrit :
Le 19/11/2014 17:34, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:14, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 19/11/2014 16:03, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 19.11.14 16:02, Guillaume Gardet wrote: > Hi, > > I think there are at least 2 boards built as u-boot RPMs, which > may be > no more used (no 13.2/Facotry JeOS images are currently using it): > * mx53loco > * colibri_t20_iris > > Is there anyone still using those u-boot RPM or having boards to test > some images? I have an i.MX53loco that I haven't tested with 13.2 yet :(. If I'm the only one with such a board, I wouldn't mind to drop support for it though. I think we should keep it if someone (you?) can test it some time. I guess we have users which are not on -arm ML.
Could you try JeOS-loco from Factory, please? A quick first run gave this on first boot. I guess we need a patch to enable bootz support?
I think so. I will prepare a patch to include bootz.
bootz should already be included (upstream). Which u-boot version is it?
MX53LOCO U-Boot > version
U-Boot 2012.04.01 (Jun 29 2013 - 20:41:16) gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.7.3 GNU ld (GNU Binutils; openSUSE Factory) 2.23.2
---
Wow, that sounds ancient O_o. I used the image "openSUSE-Factory-ARM-JeOS-loco.armv7l-1.12.1-Build238.1.raw.xz".
This is what the build log says: [ 224s] Retrieving package u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1.armv7hl (1/186), 158.1 KiB (426.5 KiB unpacked) [ 224s] ( 1/186) Installing: u-boot-mx53loco-2012.04.01-1.1 [..........done] [ 224s] Additional rpm output: [ 224s] warning: /var/cache/kiwi/packages/usr_src_packages_SOURCES_repos_devel:ARM:Factory:Contrib:IMX53_standard/u-boot-mx53loco.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA1 Signature, key ID 3f546f34: NOKEY So I guess we should remove the Contrib? ;) Alex -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org