Le 30/01/2013 20:26, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 01/30/2013 08:23 PM, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Le 30/01/2013 20:09, Alexander Graf a écrit :
On 30.01.2013, at 17:32, Guillaume Gardet wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering if we want to use /lib64 and /usr/lib64 for AArch64 or use /lib and /usr/lib.
It seems Fedora uses lib64 whereas linaro uses lib.
Debian seems to use a symlink so that lib and lib64 are the same.
Some people discussed about that on cross-distro list some times ago; AArch64 triplet thread: http://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/cross-distro/2012-November/thread.html
It seems Fedora is right using lib64 convention. Should we use it also? It is better to decide now since aarch64 is at an early stage. We should work together on building up working binaries and RPMs. We created a git repository for this - similar to what Fedora did. In there we can have different branches with binary blobs (rootfs, rpms, etc.)
We would like to add you to that git repository[1], but for that we need your github user name. Would you mind to create one or tell us what it is? :)
Ok.
It is ggardet.
Great :). You're in now. I'm currently compiling screen - let's see how that goes.
Thanks. What would be the structure of the git repo? Something like: - RPM/ - SRPM/ - bootstrap_rootfs - *.axf image - script to rebuild block-device image from rootfs ? Moreover, what would be the workflow? What would be the fastest is: using an existing rootfs (linaro or fedora) as a base and then build missing packages manually to get rpm tools to be able to build some RPM packages manually. (It is what I am doing those days). Once enough RPM are built, we rebuild a rootfs from those RPM. Then, we can build more RPM. We could also cross-build manually the first rootfs from sources. We will lose some time but we are sure that packages version are the same. What do you think about that? Guillaume -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-arm+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-arm+owner@opensuse.org