[zypp-devel] Re: [Bug 447684] zypper dup no updating all packages? however zypper up does
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'.
The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more? - -- cheers, jano Ján Kupec YaST team - ---------------------------------------------------------(PGP)--- Key ID: 637EE901 Fingerprint: 93B9 C79B 2D20 51C3 800B E09B 8048 46A6 637E E901 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkqa+8ACgkQgEhGpmN+6QFIpgCfXMmSQZjUuSx+dbZkm0dlRZ55 l1wAniUoaNF8QlZ6LU3weWdnZq/hEr64 =21bY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'.
The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more?
No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes. foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2) baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64) reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE) It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies, so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup' allowdowngrade = 1 allowarchchange = 1 allowvendorchange = 1 allowuninstall = 0 .. If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see allowvendorchange = 0 you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport. -- cu, Michael Andres +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Key fingerprint = 2DFA 5D73 18B1 E7EF A862 27AC 3FB8 9E3A 27C6 B0E4 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ Michael Andres YaST Development ma@novell.com SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nuernberg) Maxfeldstrasse 5, D-90409 Nuernberg, Germany, ++49 (0)911 - 740 53-0 +------------------------------------------------------------------+ -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Michael Andres wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'. The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote: packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more?
No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes.
sure, this is planned. I thought you have something else in mind - some sort of explanations why some packages have or haven't been selected, etc...
foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2) baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64) reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE)
It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies, so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup'
allowdowngrade = 1 allowarchchange = 1 allowvendorchange = 1 allowuninstall = 0 ..
If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see
allowvendorchange = 0
you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport.
Yes, this is a good idea. - -- cheers, jano Ján Kupec YaST team - ---------------------------------------------------------(PGP)--- Key ID: 637EE901 Fingerprint: 93B9 C79B 2D20 51C3 800B E09B 8048 46A6 637E E901 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkqh60ACgkQgEhGpmN+6QHjsQCfXMyaLOFc3FXSYfyOj4YmQIee r1YAn21MILD0XAJkCYodpMAZkH9KnFrC =Xoev -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org
On Monday 24 November 2008 11:53:33 Jan Kupec wrote:
Michael Andres wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'.
The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more?
No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes.
sure, this is planned. I thought you have something else in mind - some sort of explanations why some packages have or haven't been selected, etc...
foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2) baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64) reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE)
It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies, so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup'
allowdowngrade = 1 allowarchchange = 1 allowvendorchange = 1 allowuninstall = 0 ..
If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see
allowvendorchange = 0
you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport.
Yes, this is a good idea.
I think this will not work, because 1) nobody will notice the summary 2) those who notice will be confused what is the exact meaning Anyway, in verbose mode that might be helpful. Stano -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Stanislav Visnovsky wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 11:53:33 Jan Kupec wrote:
Michael Andres wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'. The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote: packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more? No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes. sure, this is planned. I thought you have something else in mind - some sort of explanations why some packages have or haven't been selected, etc...
foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2) baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64) reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE)
It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies, so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup'
allowdowngrade = 1 allowarchchange = 1 allowvendorchange = 1 allowuninstall = 0 ..
If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see
allowvendorchange = 0
you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport. Yes, this is a good idea.
I think this will not work, because
1) nobody will notice the summary 2) those who notice will be confused what is the exact meaning
Anyway, in verbose mode that might be helpful.
Of course, this is nothing for default output, but on demand. - -- cheers, jano Ján Kupec YaST team - ---------------------------------------------------------(PGP)--- Key ID: 637EE901 Fingerprint: 93B9 C79B 2D20 51C3 800B E09B 8048 46A6 637E E901 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkkqpfMACgkQgEhGpmN+6QHUXwCeLczMAoKTjxKSPjvLZOI6U2II MA4AmwUmZgidMoQlJozAMveKBI0Z9IaN =vOeK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org
participants (3)
-
Jan Kupec -
Michael Andres -
Stanislav Visnovsky