On Monday 24 November 2008 11:53:33 Jan Kupec wrote:
Michael Andres wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008 09:55:11 Jan Kupec wrote:
bugzilla_noreply@novell.com wrote:
--- Comment #2 from Michael Andres <ma@novell.com> 2008-11-21 11:48:55 MST ---
The second one is not necessarily a bug, because the solver uses different policies in 'dup' and 'up'. I suppose this will confuse several people, as they don't know what's the command they want to use. And as the zypper output is not very versbose, it's not that obvious why those packages were not considered in 'dup'.
The question is what should zypper show to make it obvious. It would need some additional info from the solver, currently it just gets which packages are going to be installed and which removed - no hit why. Or is there something more?
No, it's about zypper displaying just the package names. It might become more obvious, if one sees more details about the packages changes.
sure, this is planned. I thought you have something else in mind - some sort of explanations why some packages have or haven't been selected, etc...
foo (upgrade 2.1 -> 2.2) baa (downgrade 1.1 -> 0.9, arch i386 -> x_86_64) reh (reinstall 1.1 -> 1.1, vendor packman -> openSUSE)
It might also be helpfull to display an abstract of the solver policies, so one recognizes the different rules active for 'up' and 'dup'
allowdowngrade = 1 allowarchchange = 1 allowvendorchange = 1 allowuninstall = 0 ..
If you now don't see 'reh' in 'zypper up', but see
allowvendorchange = 0
you know why it's not there without need to file a bugreport.
Yes, this is a good idea.
I think this will not work, because 1) nobody will notice the summary 2) those who notice will be confused what is the exact meaning Anyway, in verbose mode that might be helpful. Stano -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: zypp-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: zypp-devel+help@opensuse.org