Klaus Kaempf wrote:

* Josef Reidinger <jreidinger@suse.cz> [Jul 07. 2009 09:35]:

...

Hi, after short discussion on ruby-dev channel and my attempt to write ajax remote call in jquery, I found that if we use jrails plugin we don't break anything as current script.aulo helpers break jquery stuff and cannot be used. So if developer want use rails helper, jrails at least don't break jquery functionality and if it doesn't work they can always use pure jquery without any helpers. Does anyone have any opinion why don't add jrails plugin? (and if so, then please specify fully working jquery stuff that act as observer ajax helper :)

The key question is maintainability. I'm all for jQuery (and jrails) as long as someone steps up and is willing to handle L3 calls on it.

Klaus --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

If we want ajax functionality, then it must be somehow handle and I think that for us is better to handle ajax calls in one separated plugin, then have different more or less working jquery functions in code. Then plugin developers could use only helpers which is quite intuitive and all problems could be solved in one place. Also this plugin contain two years of using this library and fixing bugs in it and we should use this knowledge. And at least community around this plugin is quite active. So answer is yes, I am willing to maintain this plugin if is needed as I prefer maitaining this plugin then maintaining jquery ajax calls in plugins. -- Josef Reidinger YaST team maintainer of perl-Bootloader, YaST2-Repair, webyast modules language and time -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org