data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c9a/e6c9a4261443678e4dc87b60198b32d9e929423b" alt=""
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 18:23:36 +0100 Roman Neuhauser <rneuhauser@suse.cz> wrote:
hello,
i've started dabbling in yast-meta (y2m), and i'm curious how much of it i can remove without stepping on anyone's toes. :)
* do you use y2m?
yes
* if you don't, why? * if you do, how?
simple `y2m clone ALL`
* do you have multiple checkouts? how do you workaround y2m's nominal non-support for this?
Yes, I have. I solve it by changing .y2m when I need new clone as I do not use other options
* do you have different subsets of repositories in different checkouts?
no, always all
* do you use the FAV feature? how?
no as I touch almost all modules if needed and also want grep it if needed
also:
* do you have some use cases y2m does not support? what would be welcome additions?
simple use case that for each clone do `git checkout master && git pull` . Now I solving it using `for` Also I miss generic support for do this for all modules. Useful e.g. for mass changes or for mass add of maintenance branch. Also filter for dropped modules will be nice ( quite easy to recognize as it contain only README.md and something .gitignore )
and:
* do we need y2m at all? maybe a bunch of submodules or subtrees in yast-meta would work even better?
I think we discuss it and it do not bring you enough flexibility and I heard from many sides that git submodules sucks. Also it is not generic enough as I want to checkout complete yast tree and not modify yast-mass everytime we add repo. Josef -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+owner@opensuse.org