Dne 9.1.2014 13:16, Josef Reidinger napsal(a):
We had this problem before and apparently fail to solve the inconsistency long term. So I propose to drop the MAINTAINER file in git and rely on osc.
Instead we can have a AUTHORS files so that people not knowing about osc can still reach the authors.
I agree with (re)moving MAINTAINER files, they are usually not correct and we should have just _one_ authoritative source for this information. IMHO 'osc bugowner' should be preferred.
I agree. AUTHORS can be also useful to get list of people that can potentionally have some knowledge when maintainer is not available.
For this purpose I check *.changes and/or "git log" to see who, when, how often... did some changes, that should help to find the most relevant developers. -- Ladislav Slezák Appliance department / YaST Developer Lihovarská 1060/12 190 00 Prague 9 / Czech Republic tel: +420 284 028 960 lslezak@suse.com SUSE -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org To contact the owner, e-mail: yast-devel+owner@opensuse.org