Hello, I just noticed that this mail about the aa-status changes never made it to yast-devel, probably because John isn't subscribed there. Is this mail with the json examples "good enough", or do you want/need a bugreport to track this? FYI: AppArmor 3.0 will be released soon[tm], so please don't wait too long with adjusting the YaST side. ---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ---------- Betreff: Re: [apparmor] [yast-devel] Upcoming changes in AppArmor aa-status output Datum: Mittwoch, 10. Juni 2020, 16:40:50 CEST Von: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> An: Stefan Hundhammer <shundhammer@suse.de>, Christian Boltz <opensuse@cboltz.de> Kopie: apparmor@lists.ubuntu.com, yast-devel@opensuse.org On 5/4/20 1:08 AM, Stefan Hundhammer wrote:
On 2020-04-30 13:22, Christian Boltz wrote:
Hello,
AFAIK the YaST AppArmor module uses the JSON output of aa-status.
There are two upcoming changes, and I'd like to point them out so that you can adjust the YaST AppArmor module if needed.
This time PLEASE remember to also bump the JSON version number of that output. We had to do a pretty ugly hot fix for that last time, and it was just coincidence that this did not conflict with the previous version.
the JSON version was bumped to 2 attached is an example output of aa-status, along with the corresponding pretty json and compressed json output using the new unconfined, kill, mixed, and prompt modes ------------------------------------------------------------- Regards, Christian Boltz -- ein Auto "funktioniert" auch mit eckigen Reifen, ob ich so etwas fahren möchte ist wieder eine andere Frage. [Björn Meier in postfixbuch-users]