On Friday 14 August 2009 10:57:45 Klaus Kaempf wrote:
* Josef Reidinger <jreidinger@suse.cz> [Aug 14. 2009 08:13]:
Yes, I also face this problem. I solve it by using map or array, so resulting xml looks like
<status> <metricgroup group_name="memory"> <metric name="memory-used"> <label type="array"> //array because it is array of measures <measure> <dateTime>1250178710</dateTime> <value>1.4260408320e+09</value> </measure> etc.
iirc, the xml format for the monitoring values was discussed before.
Given that values are sampled with a constant interval, it should be possible to separate timestamps from the values.
But that's not allways the case. When someone asks the rest-service for values of a longer period, eg. 5 hours it might happen that the oldest data have an interval of 70 secs while the newest got 10 secs interval.
E.g. <metric name="memory-used"> <period> <starttime>12345678990</starttime> <interval>5</interval> <samples type="array"> <value>1.4260408320e+09</value> <value>1.4284873636e+09</value> ...
This only includes one timestamp and the interval (assumed 5 seconds) and then all values in one array. Is it for sure that the values were not rearranged into a new order?
Klaus --- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, GF: Markus Rex, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org