-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dne 18.8.2011 14:25, Josef Reidinger napsal(a):
Ideas for other names: yast_agent configkit (there is still not enough kits :) yast_kit config_agent system_kit
more ideas? Also singular or plural to unify it?
One question that comes to my mind: Do we really need to call it .*agent.*? Isn't that rather kind of API used for accessing (r/w) system configuration files? Why not to base the name on the functionality it provides? 1.) 'system' and/or 'config[uration]' in the name would say what it provides. 2.) I already have enough kits ;) Thank you! 3.) Let's not use 'yast'. I thought we wanted to reuse that library whenever possible. Not only in YaST. On the other hand ... system_config might sound too close to sysconfig. Bye Lukas -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk5NK3oACgkQVSqMdRCqTizsqACgml0VKdr7LuXyvlNQ+jPm/OGp WW0AoJzdRB1SD9Rwgh5lGiOPa8ywlK1V =Fi9E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: yast-devel+unsubscribe@opensuse.org For additional commands, e-mail: yast-devel+help@opensuse.org